On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 07:39:45 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>> "Bruce" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>>many
>>>>>times.
>>>>
>>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>>
>>>
>>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>>different
>>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>>and
>>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>>
>> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>> habit of offending people.
>>
>> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
>> going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.
>>
>> People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
>> anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.
>
>To say nothing of the fact that most don't respond to filthy posts from
>anyone, including Sheldon, but many of the so called troll posts have good
>information and recipes which I will always respond to, unlike a few of the
>hateful regulars who seem intent on hassling others over everything.

You don't mind if your neighbour beats up his wife every weekend, as
long as he says hello nicely whenever you see him. It's social, and
moral retardation.