On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:54 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:34:42 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > Victor Sack wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> cshenk > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Pressure cooker not suitable.
>> >>
>> >> Heston Blumenthal disagrees:
>> >>
>> >>
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec...._zt24/Z9oCO8kt
>> >> E5wJ> >>
>> >> Victor
>> >
>> > Sorry Victor, disagree.
>>
>> cshenk is phobic of being wrong. If the subject will be pursued,
>> she'll start complicated tribal dances to create such think smoke
>> screens that nobody realizes how wrong she was anymore. Or so she
>> thinks, but we all know better
>
>There is a difference in disagreeing that a pressure cooker used by a
>chef on a time budget leads to the same product as a long slow cooking,
>and whatever you think.
>
snip

taste tests have shown that of the three (side by side testing),
standard cooking, pressure cooking and slow cooker cooking that slow
cooker cooking produces the poorest results of taste, mouth feel and
mineral extraction while the other two produce equal results.