On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:55:03 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote:
>>
>> > Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with
>> > bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make
>> > people buy something they think might be new and improved.
>>
>> Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth
>> is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth.
>
>Wrong. Bone broth is just a trending new description of stock.
>Don't look that up and go exact on us. Give me a break.
>
>-broth is made from meat only
>-stock is made from bones with nips of meat
>-true stock is made from bones with all meat
> stripped completely. No one does that.
>
>I've never made just broth - meat only.
>I do make broth/stock often (that's a combo
>of meat and bones)
>Normal definition of stock is like pick the roast Thanksgiving
>turkey clean the make stock out of the bones/carcass.
>
>That stock is very flavorful, much more than a chicken carcass
>picked clean.
>
>You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth.
>Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty
>new name.

All BS, whether broth or consomme depends on whether stock is
clarified. There is no such thing as "bone broth" because broth is
clarified stock. Bone broth is definately not a culinary term, sounds
like a Madison Ave. advertising term for squeezing dollars out of
imbeciles who never cook.
Most home cooks do not clarify their stock... I only clarify stock
when I'm making Jewish Penicilian; clear golden soup.