On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 23:23:12 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> newsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b667a/b667a596c8a59adff3e594220ac8513a3aaf1e4e" alt="Embarrassment"
>> >
>> >"Cheri" > wrote in message
>> news
>> > wrote in message
>> crg.pbz...
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation
>> > > > they've created to make it sound like something magical. It's
>> > > > not. It's just old-fashioned stock, made with bones.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's
>> > > laughable really.
>> >
>> > I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it.
>> >
>> > https://www.epicurious.com/ingredien...k-broth-bone-b
>> > roth-article
>>
>>
>> It's still just stock and I really don't see any difference except in
>> the name, more protein in stock is just a matter of what you put in
>> it.
>>
>> Cheri
>
>Hi Cheri, I think the diference is the real stuff you can make at home,
>vs. the palid stuff from the store. HUGE difference there.
Cheri is against criticism of store bought stuff. Careful or she'll
killfile you.