On 11/2/2017 10:53 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 5:05:15 AM UTC-10, Nancy2 wrote:
>> Oops, my really bad...I almost always note the date before responding, but missed it
>> here. Sorry. (Slowly backing out of thread.....)
>>
>> N.
>
> I don't have any problem with responding to these archival posts. The situation is pretty much the same. Baker's Joy still won't work for some people. I'm just giving an update to this 17 year old post.
>
> People resent others that respond to these Google Group archive posts because they don't have the ability/desire to see past their NNTP server's retention period. People never did appreciate others that can see further than themselves.
>

Plus there's something almost John Titor-fanciful about replying to a
post that old as if the matrix overlays of time and space have been
folded back together like an origami duck!