"jmcquown" > wrote in message
news
> On 11/4/2017 2:02 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 12:42:59 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, here's the gist. A military spouse if there are enough that
>>> qualify for the job, has to be interviewed first so they can support an
>>> active duty member. Once retired, that active duty member who may well
>>> be sole support for the family, (including spouse), has to wait at the
>>> back of the line until the spouses are interviewed. We only get seen
>>> if none of them after interview can be seen as able to do the job.
>>
>> You don't get it. She doesn't give a flying fig. She's already given
>> you a reasonable answer that shows the circumstances wouldn't have
>> made any difference to her at the time.
>>
> No, Carol doesn't get it. "She had some chances that sadly she didnt know
> about." Julie did apply and got a "thank you for your interest letter".
> Carol keeps trying to push this as if she's got a personal stake in the
> matter.
>
> Jill

OMFG are *you* ever confused! *Julie* didn't apply for anything. Carol did.
I made the smart assed comment about needing Bruce to explain it
because...uh...I was being a smart ass!