"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 11/4/2017 2:02 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> >On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 12:42:59 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Ok, here's the gist. A military spouse if there are enough that
>> > > qualify for the job, has to be interviewed first so they can
>> > > support an active duty member. Once retired, that active duty
>> > > member who may well be sole support for the family, (including
>> > > spouse), has to wait at the back of the line until the spouses
>> > > are interviewed. We only get seen if none of them after
>> > > interview can be seen as able to do the job.
>> >
>> > You don't get it. She doesn't give a flying fig. She's already
>> > given you a reasonable answer that shows the circumstances wouldn't
>> > have made any difference to her at the time.
>> >
>> No, Carol doesn't get it. "She had some chances that sadly she didnt
>> know about." Julie did apply and got a "thank you for your interest
>> letter". Carol keeps trying to push this as if she's got a personal
>> stake in the matter.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Jill, don't try to redirect this. We may have other military spouses
> who needed that informaton on how to get a job when their other side
> relocates. My information is solid and has nothing to do with Julie.

At this point, we're all going to need Bruce to slog through and sort out
this mess!