View Single Post
  #256 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
cshenk cshenk is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,197
Default Cheese shop visit

jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 11/5/2017 11:48 AM, cshenk wrote:
> > Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > >
> >>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
> > > news > > > > On 11/4/2017 2:02 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 12:42:59 -0500, "cshenk" >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, here's the gist. A military spouse if there are enough
> > > > > > that qualify for the job, has to be interviewed first so
> > > > > > they can support an active duty member. Once retired, that
> > > > > > active duty member who may well be sole support for the
> > > > > > family, (including spouse), has to wait at the back of the
> > > > > > line until the spouses are interviewed. We only get seen
> > > > > > if none of them after interview can be seen as able to do
> > > > > > the job.
> > > > >
> > > > > You don't get it. She doesn't give a flying fig. She's
> > > > > already given you a reasonable answer that shows the
> > > > > circumstances wouldn't have made any difference to her at
> > > > > the time.
> > > > >
> > > > No, Carol doesn't get it. "She had some chances that sadly she
> > > > didnt know about." Julie did apply and got a "thank you for
> > > > your interest letter". Carol keeps trying to push this as if
> > > > she's got a personal stake in the matter.
> > > >
> > > > Jill
> > >
> > > OMFG are you ever confused! Julie didn't apply for anything. Carol
> > > did. I made the smart assed comment about needing Bruce to
> > > explain it because...uh...I was being a smart ass!

> >
> > What part of this didnt you get?
> >
> > "Jill, don't try to redirect this. We may have other military
> > spouses who needed that informaton on how to get a job when their
> > other side relocates. My information is solid and has nothing to do
> > with Julie."
> >
> > Specifically 'HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH JULIE'.
> >
> > There are other people here, and some of them may need the
> > information and that is why it was passed on.
> >
> >

> Really? Lots of military spouses here who need to know about this?
> Where did you get that idea?
>
> Jill


What gives you the idea we may not have any? I said some. You are the
one radicallizing the numbers. It could even be a guy who's passing it
to a wife who's not a member here or a guy with a grandchild in that
situation passing it on.

Why do you object to basic job chances being mentioned that others may
way tto know about? It's not like we don't have enough OT stuff here.

--