On 11/12/2017 11:41 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Sunday, November 12, 2017 at 7:36:14 AM UTC-10, casa chevrolet wrote:
>> Of course it is factual, no dispute.
>>
>> My POINT, which you seem to have completely missed despite the clarity
>> with which I made it is - the numbers are not coherent with what we as
>> humans are used to on this planet in terms of how we describe
>> environmental conditions.
>>
>> It's therefore "sci-fi sounding" in the sheer oddity of the very high
>> numbers used.
>>
>> That's it.
>
> I don't care what scale folks use, just as long as it uses divisions of 25 and 50 and starts at 200.
>

I'm old school.

Fahrenheit or nada.