FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

casa chevrolet

On 11/13/2017 5:52 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0700, casa chevrolet >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>> snip
>>>>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>>>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>>>>
>>>>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>>>>> to warrant courtesy.
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>>>
>>> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
>>> very courteous.
>>
>> Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?
>>
>> Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:
>>
>> "Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."
>>
>> - and that's where you snipped my context -
>>
>> "(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"
>>
>> Basically so.
>>
>>> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
>>> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
>>
>> You have a real sexism problem, your own.
>>
>>> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.
>>
>> Maybe so.
>>
>> But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?
>
> That it EVER happens, speaks for what he is like.

Oh really?!?!?!

So you're of the *perfect human* camp?

We had one of those once upon a time - he was........CRUCIFIED to death!

And I can't recall seeing a messiah on any ballot lately.

Including that outright Marxist of yours who was raised to pander to
communists.

>>> crickets<
>>
>>
>>> (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>>>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>>>>
>>>> That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>>>> facts.
>>>>
>>>> Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>>>>
>>>> Hard to change what has almost always been effective.