On 11/30/2017 9:40 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/30/2017 1:18 AM, Usenet Support Personnel wrote:
>> This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the reorganization
>> of the unmoderated newsgroup, rec.food.cooking.
>>
>> This RFD is being posted to news.announce.newgroups, news.groups,
>> rec.food.cooking, rec.food.drink, rec.food.historic,
>> rec.food.recipes, rec.food.sourdough, rec.food.veg and
>> rec.food.veg.cooking, with followups set to news.groups.Â* All
>> discussion regarding this proposal should take place in news.groups.
>>
>> Rationale: Rec.food.cooking has been a high-volume newsgroup for
>> many years, and the subject of splitting has been brought up with
>> a fair amount of regularity.Â* Traditionally, rec.food.cooking had
>> been an amazingly civil, calm and flame-free newsgroup, so a split
>> never seemed to be justified.
>>
>> However, in recent years the noise level and number of inappropriate
>> posts has skyrocketed, and polite pointers to the FAQs (which usually
>> did the trick before) now go ignored or become targets for flames.Â* I
>> feel that splitting rec.food.cooking will help bring back the focus
>> that it once had.
>>
>> Proposal: rec.food.cooking be split into 5 unmoderated groups:
>>
>> rec.food.cooking.misc
>> rec.food.cooking.cookware
>> rec.food.cooking.recipes
>> rec.food.cooking.books
>> rec.food.cooking.discuss
>>
> All Newsgroups have deteriorated, but a split will just destroy what
> little is left.Â* I'm not going to hunt through 5 different groups.


OK come on now Sqwerty is reposting, sans url, an ancient RFC from 1994!