On 2018-01-14 5:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:03:50 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2018-01-14 5:01 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:00:00 -0500, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-01-14 4:51 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:44:39 -0500, Dave Smith
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-01-14 3:07 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Works for me Cindy. It got so convoluted that by the end I couldnt
>>>>>>>>> tell where she started. Then again, as others added side topics, Julie
>>>>>>>>> was responding as if it was to her original (they weren't, we seeged
>>>>>>>>> off to Meatloaf and other things as normal for here).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave wins here and by many years. He got yelled at forever but he
>>>>>>>> spotted it way back then. :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave complains that people reply to Julie but nobody replies to Julie
>>>>>>> as much as Dave.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's bullshit, but the archives are available for you to check and
>>>>>> come back with proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> Half of Julie's threads consist of posts by you, warning the world
>>>>> about Julie.
>>>>>
>>>> More bullshit. I do occasionally point out that she is a narcissistic
>>>> attention seeker and an inveterate liar. That would include pointing
>>>> out specific examples of her lying, and then lying about having lied.
>>>
>>> See? There you go again.
>>>
>> That was not a response to Julie.
>
> But you were warning the world again.
>


Not really.. just explaining what I had done. However I will point out
that you shifted lanes there. First you said that nobody replies to
Julie as much as I do. That is utter bullshit because I had her filtered
for a long time, so I could not replay to her directly. Many others
seemed incapable of resisting, so I was exposed to her posts anyway.