FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Broce

On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:44:27 -0400, wrote:

>On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:40:37 +1100, Broce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:07:02 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:08:45 +1100, Broce >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:56:49 -0400, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:14:39 +1100, Broce >
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:41:32 -0400, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:47:24 +1100, Broce >
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:37:31 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Having watched a birth, I don't know why anyone would want to go through
>>>>>>>>>that even a first time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If more women felt that way, overpopulation could be solved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh??? Is the overpopulation all virgin birth?????
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Birth in general.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then it is not up to 'women' to solve it alone? Could it also be men
>>>>>should stay zipped up??
>>>>
>>>>Of course. But y'all were talking about how painful child birth is and
>>>>I said it's a shame it doesn't discourage more women from having
>>>>children (esp. in overpopulated poor countries). That doesn't apply to
>>>>men.
>>>
>>>In those countries abstinence would be the only possible way - that
>>>should apply to both, not just the woman.
>>
>>What I said wasn't about man against woman. I don't see everything in
>>those terms.
>
>Then why say "If more women felt that way, overpopulation could be
>solved."

Most women want children at some point in their lives. If child birth
was 5 times more painful, many women might not want them anymore.