On Fri, 11 May 2018 03:00:40 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
>> On 2018-05-10 6:02 PM, wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 May 2018 17:18:35 -0400, Nancy Young >
>>
>>>>
>>>> i could just drive it to the post office.
>>>>
>>>> nancy
>>>
>>> It's far more important to donate to animal shelters... lazy fat assed
>>> druggie ******* humans can get a job and buy their own food... I'd not
>>> donate toothpics to food banks for humans. The dwarf and his ilk
>>> would steal first pick.
>>
>> I still disagree about that. Pet ownership involves responsibility. If you
>> can't afford to buy pet food you should not have pets. They depend on
>> owners. They should be fed a diet of the food that is best for them and
>> should not be switching back and forth depending on what is available at
>> the food bank.
>
>Although this is true, sometimes a person needs help temporarily and I think
>it is better for the pet to stay in their home with a person who loves them.

Lots of homeless people have pets and as they wander the streets
people make sure their pets are fed. One drunk with a cat pushed all
his belongings in a supermarket cart, I would always give him a couple
cans of Friskies for his cat, never gave him money or it would go to
booze. Many of my neigbors left out pet food for the homeless with
pets. The homeless treat their pets very well, it's all the family
they have. I've even paid for a homeless man to bring his cat to the
Vet. The Vet knew he was homeless and only charged $20 for the exam
and shots., I was glad to pay it. But I would never give beans to a
skanky food bank.