On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 4:22:13 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:27:00 -0600, U.S. Janet B. >
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:51:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Doris Night" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 19:17:32 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>This looks like a super good deal! Does anyone have this? Do you like it?
> >>>>The reviews are mostly good but some say they hate it or that it needs
> >>>>better instructions.
> >>>>
> >>>>https://www.surlatable.com/product/P...=398009_278888
> >>>
> >>> I have one of those, and I like it very much.
> >>>
> >>> Doris
> >>
> >>Thanks!
> >
> >
> >It's clever marketing. . .like calling a girdle Spanx. Pressure
> >cooker and girdle are old fashioned sounding. The new names don't
> >bear the same negative association. 'A rose by any other name' etc.
> >etc., etc.
> >Janet US
>
>
> I've no use for a pressure processor, they cook at too high a
> temperature just to save time. I've got no reason to save time at the
> expense of poor results. It's like when I was still
> working and my boss would ask me when the job would be done
> and I'd tell him you have two choices, do you want fast or good. With
> wet cooking (braising) the best results are achieved by cooking at the
> lowest temperatures. Pot cooking is like ****ing, long and slow is
> best... I'm never in a hurry to end the pleasure for a thankless
> result... I've not yet met the women who is happy with a two minute
> **** or a thirty minute pot roast. Seems from the posts that a lot of
> yoose ladies are very used to a two minute ****... lets get it over
> with so yoose can get back to tv.

You don't occasionally enjoy one that's fast, hard, hot, and exhilarating?

Well, I suppose at your age the risk of injury is too great.

Cindy Hamilton