FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Hank Rogers[_2_]

wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 19:39:52 -0500, Hank Rogers >
> wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:23:38 -0700 (PDT), "
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 3:06:05 PM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't use the term 'joint of meat'. It reminds me more of the PBS
>>>>> series 'King Henry the VIII' and him eating an obvious leg of
>>>>> something. Leg of Mutton I think it was in that scene.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I know, hahahaaaa! When I hear a 'joint of meat' I think of two stout
>>>> men laboring to bring in a huge slab of meat with an enormous bone in it.
>>>> They're barely able to lift the platter onto the table before plunking
>>>> it down with a great thud and dishes and cups and glasses clatter about.
>>>
>>> To my knowledge a "joint of meat" always refered to a large penis...
>>> an enormous bone refers to a large erection.
>>>
>>
>> More of yoose faggot posts, Popeye?
>>
>> Yoose just can't help turning anything into a sex fantasy, can yoose?
>>
>> Yoose a low down, sorry SOB.
>
> You're just jealous because you never get laid... not even by some
> ugli faggot.
>

Popeye, I bet yoose humped yoose own mammy when yoose was 10 years old.