On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 03:07:42 -0000 (UTC), Jinx the Minx
> wrote:

>Brice > wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:11:40 -0000 (UTC), Jinx the Minx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Brice > wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:38:48 -0500, Boron Elgar
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Guidelines have recently been revised based on long term studies of
>>>>> risks and benefits. The suggestion used to be lower HbA1C levels in
>>>>> thinking that it would help reduce microvascular complications.
>>>>> Studies have not borne that out, thought so...
>>>>>
>>>>> T2 goals are now between 7.0 and 8.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/26...nt-adults-type
>>>>
>>>> Well, there you go.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Relevant article, thank you. I think it bears noting that A1C targets for
>>> those diagnosed and being treated for diabetes are higher than used to
>>> diagnose diabetes.
>>
>> It's clearly not as black and white as you thought.
>>
>
>It is very black and white. Even if considered a “good” level for a
>diabetic, it’s still indicative of having diabetes. That is all.

This was a test. You failed. Thank you.