On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:17:16 -0000 (UTC), Jinx the Minx
> wrote:

>Brice > wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 03:07:42 -0000 (UTC), Jinx the Minx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Brice > wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:11:40 -0000 (UTC), Jinx the Minx
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Brice > wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:38:48 -0500, Boron Elgar
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guidelines have recently been revised based on long term studies of
>>>>>>> risks and benefits. The suggestion used to be lower HbA1C levels in
>>>>>>> thinking that it would help reduce microvascular complications.
>>>>>>> Studies have not borne that out, thought so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> T2 goals are now between 7.0 and 8.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/26...nt-adults-type
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, there you go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Relevant article, thank you. I think it bears noting that A1C targets for
>>>>> those diagnosed and being treated for diabetes are higher than used to
>>>>> diagnose diabetes.
>>>>
>>>> It's clearly not as black and white as you thought.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is very black and white. Even if considered a ?good? level for a
>>> diabetic, it?s still indicative of having diabetes. That is all.
>>
>> This was a test. You failed. Thank you.
>>
>
>Whatever you say, Bruce.

That's the spirit.