On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:48:54 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/15/2019 3:40 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
>> What you posted has nothing to do with my point. The general populace
>> knows nothing about types of governance and don't care to.
>> I simply am waiting and watching as each contender puts themselves out
>> there and begins to hone their message. I am not willing to downplay
>> everyone up front.
>
>Sensible and I agree somewhat but some have put out enough to be
>cancelled from my consideration.
>
>
> As to OAC, my impression is that you would be
>> against anything having to do with conservation or anything that
>> hinted at climate change. OAC has certainly put herself out there to
>> be vilified. She's a threatening magnet. She's young, female,
>> attractive, isn't afraid to speak out and speak back. She's a threat
>> to most older men regardless of her message.
>> Janet US
>>
>
>Your impression is very wrong. I'm very much in favor of conservation
>and have practiced more than most for many years. Long before she was
>born I was doing things to conserve energy and help the environment.
>I spent quite a bit on my house and the last two to make it energy
>efficient, as the same where I worked. I'll give a list if requested.

Does the list start with leaving your airco on 24/24?

>She would get much more attention from people if she did not make loopy
>statements and be a hypocrite.

Maybe her statements come across loopy because you deliberately
misrepresent them. Maybe you want her to shut up and choose her food
from a menu without prices.

>There have been many articles about her
>travel and use of fossil fuels when she could have set an example for
>others.

I now know that everything you say about her, could be spin and has to
be double checked. You have an agenda.