FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Jeßus[_55_]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:21:52 -0300, wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:32:23 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:18:33 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I won't be buying a Dyson. Never had a vac that was not ready to use
>>>seconds after cleaning or replacing a filter.
>>>
>>>If something spills I have a $30 portable to clean it up. Regular
>>>vacuuming is done by the cleaning lady. The regular vac has not been
>>>touched for a long time.
>>
>>Whatever happened to simple, decent vacuum cleaners that just worked,
>>and worked well for a long time? Most all the newer ones have gimmicky
>>technology and seem problematic and unreliable.
>>
>>I bought my Wertheim vacuum cleaner back in 2000 - very powerful and
>>with a simple bag system. Still works perfectly - and I bought mine
>>refurbished, I have no idea of it's true age. It's been used on
>>average twice a week over the years I've owned it. The bristles on the
>>floor attachment wore down to the point where they needed replacing
>>about two years ago, but that's reasonable wear and tear of course.
>
>You're both listening to what Smith says -

Well, I was responding to his post, so yes. I also mentioned in my
reply that I've come across a lot of similar complaints about modern
brand of vacuum cleaners. The Dyson brand seems to come up the most
IME.

>I have a V10 Dyson and love
>it. I have cleaned the filter once in several months and as I pointed
>out to Dave, at the time, it dried in about an hour because after I
>rinsed it, I stuffed some paper towel into the cavity. I use it more
>and more and the regular vacuum less and less.

Glad you are satisfied with yours.