On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:02:59 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote:

>In article >, Bruce
> wrote:
>
>> The majority of the world's scientists are all quacks? I guess your
>> definition of a quack is someone who tells you things you don't want
>> to hear.
>
>No Boobaloo. The majority of the world's climatologists are quacks
>shilling for a belief that you are swallowing whole. You've been told
>that crap pumped into your head by "news organizations" is true as
>well. True scientists produce repeatable results. Repeatable results
>cannot be produced by prognostication.
>You won't understand. Your entire belief system is spoon fed to you by
>liars and shills. Think for yourself. Just this once. For me.
>I'm glad that you're here to entertain me once again ;-)

So I have to choose between the opinions of the world's scientists on
one side and the insights of Sir Leo on the other.

Damn, you make it hard, man!