|
|
|
|
Is eating dogs moral?
On 26 Nov 2003 09:47:27 -0800, (Chicha) wrote:
>Kate Connally > wrote in message >...
>> Chicha wrote:
>> >
>> > Kate Connally > wrote in message >...
>> > > Kenneth Leja wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Asian countries like China think it's okay. Koreans think beating a
>> > > > dog to death will release hormones that will make human eaters
>> > > > sexually more virile.
>> > > >
>> > > > Is this okay or is it just Western cultural bias that finds this
>> > > > custom kinda sick?
>> > >
>> > > I think it's okay if you haven't named them.
>> > > You should never eat anything with a name.
>> >
>> > Hey, you are finding excuses.
>> > Would you ate pig known to you as number 48/7 :-)
>> > Generally speaking, your suggestion is to never
>> > eat an animal you have personal relations with?
>> > That is not what happens in small farms.
>>
>> Well, then, I guess that's why I'm not a farmer.
>
>You are lucky.
>Small rural farms are known breeding grounds for immorality ;-)
>
>> I guess I would have a problem actually *eating*
>> a pig with a name, but I sure couldn't kill it.
>
>I have a confession to make:
>I took part in murder of Boris the boar back in 1983.
>Nobody had guts/skills to kill the beast with a knife.
>Had somebody shot him into the ear finally.
>(One special thing about guns - make killing much easier to commit).
>Pork was delicious, anyway.
>
Well, killing dogs for food isn't much of a crime, but torturing it
with slow death is BIG time crime. Japan history has a culture of
torture both for sport and study - from Shogun to Unit 731 - and they
include humans! Hope history does not repeat, come future wars.
Why resort to torture? It only brings out the ugly side of a people,
nothing to brag about even if it is for 'scientific research'. Unit
731 put on a stain and stigma on the Japanese, which will take several
more decades to erase. Nothing glorious for sure, whether it is for
the emperor or not.
|