On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 18:35:30 +1000, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 18:07:22 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:08:36 +1000, Bruce >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:36:57 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article >, tert in seattle
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how a person can argue with "the 10 warmest years on record
>>>>> have all occurred since 1998" - it's just data, and it needs to be taken
>>>>> seriously, not confused with this sunspots crap or whatever
>>>>
>>>>Oh, that's easy! I lost my job in the late seventies to global cooling.
>>>>That made me a sceptic. The grand data points on whatever graph you're
>>>>selling have been collected by "climatologists" since then, when they
>>>>learned that being a compliant "climatologist" means big bucks from
>>>>taxpayer funding [government grants] if they can sell a program that
>>>>benefits the various governments. Keep the populace afraid, and control
>>>>them with blather and points on a questionable graph.
>>>>Climate change is ongoing since our planet first formed.
>>>
>>>But it's going very fast and it's very damaging. And if we're causing
>>>it -which scientists say is the case- then we can also stop it.
>>
>>I really don't think so. And it isn't really all that 'going fast',
>>either. Presumably you must have heard of a solution if you say it can
>>be stopped? If so, please let the world know what that is.
>
>Reduce CO2 emissions, switch to sustainable energy, that whole story.
>
>>>Unfortunately, that's going to cost some money and the biggest
>>>polluters -the US and China- hate spending money.
>>
>>Your logic/biases are very questionable at times.
>
>That you question something doesn't necessarily mean it's questionable
>

Correct. This case is an exception, however.