On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 11:34:16 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 2:44:44 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:14:31 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:41:15 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The concerns of the younger generations are real. My guess is that her rage is not faked. Her strength is her ability to deliver a highly-focused message in a blunt, non-PC, manner. It's probably her weakness too.
> > > >
> > > OCD, which she either suffers from or enjoys, will do that to you. Her only
> > > sister has neurological problems as well.
> > >
> > > https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/...rgs-un-speech/
> >
> > Beats me if she has OCD. She does have an autistic spectrum disorder which can be debilitating while paradoxically, allows some people to soar. It's a double edged bazooka but I wouldn't call it mental illness.
> >
> Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
> seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
> an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>
> https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>
> But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
> illness.
>
> This statement has nothing to do with her moment in the spotlight but I
> find her to look very, very young and underdeveloped to be 16. To my
> eyes, I feel like I'm looking at a 10-12 year old prepubescent; not a
> young lady on the cusp of womanhood.

Geeks have always been made fun of and ridiculed. I never did that as a kid, there's no reason to start doing that as an adult. As far as I can see, her neurological makeup, appearance, flat-facial affect, movement, pronunciation of English, etc., etc., etc., are not relevant to her message. That's the important part but this group will always allow itself to get distracted by the smallest of things. I think this group has ADS.