On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:36:44 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 2019-09-29 4:27 p.m., wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, September 29, 2019 at 3:08:14 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:58:11 -0500,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well considering that I do have a gluten sensitivity then I would say
>>>>> you are incorrect. Also the fact that Wheat is NOT a plant that is
>>>>> supposed to be eaten then I would also say that your dissertation is
>>>>> incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Wheat's not supposed to be eaten? I've never had a bad reaction to
>>>> bread yet.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, who would have thought that wheat has been used in some form for at
>>> least 2000 years but our self diagnosed 'expert' says it's NOT supposed to
>>> be eaten. My, my, my.
>>
>>
>> Read more,
>
>But not books by quacks!

They're not all quacks, Graham. Do some research... look at some
scientific literature. Do you know how to do that? For somebody so
enamored by scientific rigor, you regularly display the exact opposite
in your rigid * beliefs*.