On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 06:09:53 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, September 29, 2019 at 3:08:14 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:58:11 -0500,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Well considering that I do have a gluten sensitivity then I would say
>>> >you are incorrect. Also the fact that Wheat is NOT a plant that is
>>> >supposed to be eaten then I would also say that your dissertation is
>>> >incorrect.
>>>
>>> Wheat's not supposed to be eaten? I've never had a bad reaction to
>>> bread yet.
>>>
>>Yeah, who would have thought that wheat has been used in some form for at
>>least 2000 years but our self diagnosed 'expert' says it's NOT supposed to
>>be eaten. My, my, my.
>
>Yes, only 2000 years. Glad you acknowledged that. Wheat is grass seed,
>and was never a part of the human diet until the advent of agriculture
>made it a viable source of food. And he said "supposed to be eaten"
>not your embellished "NOT supposed to be eaten"
>
>A lot of common foodstuffs are not supposed to be eaten. That's not to
>say you can't eat them without a problem manifesting itself.
More nonsense. Can people with real or imagined sensitivities stop
acting as if everybody else has their problems as well?
Just read the ingredient list
