On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 20:44:46 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 12/7/2019 7:34 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 19:26:07 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/7/2019 6:57 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 15:39:49 -0800 (PST), "
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, December 7, 2019 at 5:21:37 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 17:57:08 -0500, Dave Smith
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We may have to cut some slack for the Dutchman. They like to think of
>>>>>>> themselves as victims of the German aggression, but there were a lot
>>>>>>> more of his countrymen who joined the Nazis than the Resistance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That, true or not, also doesn't justify throwing atomic bombs on
>>>>>> civilians. It's quite shocking that you 2 can't see that because of
>>>>>> your huge bias.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What would have been your solution to bringing the war to an end? Senselessly
>>>>> killing more 10's of hundreds of thousands people? Just how would you have
>>>>> ended it??
>>>>
>>>> Whatever you do, you don't bomb innocent babies, children, men, women.
>>>> That's the kind of stuff you DON'T want. That kind of behaviour is the
>>>> problem, not the solution.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What would have been a better solution? Were you there? The Japanese
>>> did not care about anyone in the battles all along and they were
>>> planning to fight to the end.
>>> These are the same people that brought you the Bataan Death March.
>>
>> You grew up with American spin telling you that it was a good thing to
>> do. An honorable thing. A necessary thing. This is now written in
>> stone in your brain, no matter how insane that is.
>>
>Pretty simple rally. If the bombing save a million lives it was a good
>thing. If it saved no lives it was a bad thing. Just show me the
>truth, real facts.

The real facts are that the US killed little girls, little boys,
women, innocent men, elderly. And to top that, you justify it, agree
with it. Maybe stick with being the Robin Hood of the rich and
corrupt.