View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Ed Pawlowski[_5_] Ed Pawlowski[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,559
Default cooking spray on non stick

On 1/5/2020 12:05 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 1/4/2020 5:17 PM, wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 12:39:03 -0800 (PST), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 1:58:34 PM UTC-6,
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well the first problem is the fact that you are using cooking spray
>>>> for anything at all. Oil in a bottle is bad enough because it is
>>>> heavily processed. The crap in a can is the same but with added
>>>> chemicals. Why would you ever want to eat that?
>>>>
>>> Source?

>>
>>
>>
https://www.foxnews.com/health/the-t...cooking-sprays
>>
>>
>> You should really learn how to look stuff up for yourself and stop
>> asking for sources.
>>
>> Â* --
>>
>> Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>

>
>
> " After reviewing animal studies, the World Health Organization stated
> that they found no adverse health effects associated with
> Dimethylpolysiloxane. However, personally, Im uncomfortable feeding my
> family a chemical that has uses in cosmetics and Silly Putty."
>
> She must be starving her family then.
>


There were a couple of dumb statements in her article. She does is
concerned about ingesting the propellant also. I can't figure out how
you eat something dispersed into the air.