View Single Post
  #67 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Graham Graham is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,541
Default cooking spray on non stick

On 2020-01-05 6:24 p.m., wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 17:03:44 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 1/5/2020 12:05 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>>> On 1/4/2020 5:17 PM,
wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 12:39:03 -0800 (PST), "
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, January 4, 2020 at 1:58:34 PM UTC-6,
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well the first problem is the fact that you are using cooking spray
>>>>>> for anything at all. Oil in a bottle is bad enough because it is
>>>>>> heavily processed. The crap in a can is the same but with added
>>>>>> chemicals. Why would you ever want to eat that?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Source?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://www.foxnews.com/health/the-t...cooking-sprays
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You should really learn how to look stuff up for yourself and stop
>>>> asking for sources.
>>>>
>>>> Â* --
>>>>
>>>> Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> " After reviewing animal studies, the World Health Organization stated
>>> that they found no adverse health effects associated with
>>> Dimethylpolysiloxane. However, personally, Im uncomfortable feeding my
>>> family a chemical that has uses in cosmetics and Silly Putty."
>>>
>>> She must be starving her family then.
>>>

>>
>> There were a couple of dumb statements in her article. She does is
>> concerned about ingesting the propellant also. I can't figure out how
>> you eat something dispersed into the air.

>
>
> well ed think of it this way, drinking a carbonated soda is from
> putting the cola in a pressurized container and then adding CO2 to it.
> when you drink the soda you are also drinking the CO2.
>

and then belching it!