On Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 7:40:35 PM UTC-10, Leo wrote:
> On 2020 Jan 12, , dsi1 wrote
> (in >):
>
> > I don't consider it to be a lie. It's a rather apt description. You know what
> > it means, they know what it means, he knows what it means. When you think
> > about it, most things that we name is a lie. A hunk of meat is not really
> > meat. It's not anything that we choose to arbitrarily call it. It just "is."
>
> Existential deep stuff! Are you sitting with your legs crossed and burning
> incense? Im going with a more descriptive and just now appropriated
> Sheldon definition. Mystery meat.
>
> leo

Somebody has to do the deep thinking in this group. Who's going to do it, you? As far as I know, there's no reason to call meat, "meat." One might get away with saying that a dog should be called "woof-woof" or a drum could be aptly named a "boom-boom."

Most things in this world are just arbitrarily, named. If everything in this world were correctly named, different languages wouldn't exist. Evidently, being able to realize this requires extra heavy duty thinking skills. Don't hate me because I'm deep.