On 2020-05-02 10:23 a.m., graham wrote:
> On 2020-05-01 7:29 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2020-05-01 8:48 p.m., graham wrote:
>>> On 2020-04-30 11:41 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>>> On 2020 Apr 30, , graham wrote
>>>> (in article >):
>>>>
>>>>> Tell us, what is there to admire in this moronic POTUS?
>>>>
>>>> Hows that sap that runs your tiny population country doing? Hes a
>>>> dandy with a pedigree, Ill give him that. What were his other
>>>> qualifications? Did you vote for him? If so, why?
>>>>
>>>> leo
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He's widely respected by other world leaders and at least he has the
>>> guts to introduce sensible gun controls.
>>
>> I trust that you aren't referring to his latest knee jerk reaction to
>> the guy who went on a rampage that including killing a cop and
>> stealing her gun to shoot more people. The firearms he banned today
>> have not posed a problem to anyone.Â* Meanwhile, he has opened up the
>> prison doors and released scores of violent offenders.
>
> https://postimg.cc/VrhpCKpy
>


Ahh... the old pseudo intellectual association of fire arms and penis
size. That ranks up there with the irony of people assuming that all
cops are racists.

Target shooting is a legitimate recreational activity. Hunting is a
legitimate recreational activity. The firearms banned can be used to
hunting and target shooting. There was absolutely no reason to ban them
and it was a knee jerk reaction to an incident that did not involve that
class of firearm. It affects only the "assault rifles" that are in the
hands of legally licensed gun owners, who have proven themselves to be
trustworthy, and it does absolutely nothing to deal the problem of hung
gang members running around shooting each other to protect their drug
business and the sense of street honour.

Carding worked well, but the people in the communities didn't like being
profiled. They eliminated carding and shootings immediately jumped 50%.
Maybe you can find a silly cartoon to try to explain that.