On Sat, 2 May 2020 11:47:54 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2020-05-02 10:23 a.m., graham wrote:
>> On 2020-05-01 7:29 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2020-05-01 8:48 p.m., graham wrote:
>>>> On 2020-04-30 11:41 p.m., Leo wrote:
>>>>> On 2020 Apr 30, , graham wrote
>>>>> (in article >):
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell us, what is there to admire in this moronic POTUS?
>>>>>
>>>>> How’s that sap that runs your tiny population country doing? He’s a
>>>>> dandy with a pedigree, I’ll give him that. What were his other
>>>>> qualifications? Did you vote for him? If so, why?
>>>>>
>>>>> leo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He's widely respected by other world leaders and at least he has the
>>>> guts to introduce sensible gun controls.
>>>
>>> I trust that you aren't referring to his latest knee jerk reaction to
>>> the guy who went on a rampage that including killing a cop and
>>> stealing her gun to shoot more people. The firearms he banned today
>>> have not posed a problem to anyone.* Meanwhile, he has opened up the
>>> prison doors and released scores of violent offenders.
>>
>> https://postimg.cc/VrhpCKpy
>>
>
>
>Ahh... the old pseudo intellectual association of fire arms and penis
>size. That ranks up there with the irony of people assuming that all
>cops are racists.

Look, Davey, m'boy, you're a right wing gun toting white guy. You've
always defended assault weapon ownership and praised butch-acting
cops. It is what you are. I assume you are a racist with a small
dick, too.
>
>Target shooting is a legitimate recreational activity.

So is stamp collecting. Anybody ever shoot up a school with a stamp
scrapbook?

>Hunting is a
>legitimate recreational activity.

Hunting for food is understandable. Hunting for recreation is only
legitimate in the mind of a sick **** like you or Eric & Donnie Trump.

> The firearms banned can be used to
>hunting and target shooting. There was absolutely no reason to ban them
>and it was a knee jerk reaction to an incident that did not involve that
>class of firearm. It affects only the "assault rifles" that are in the
>hands of legally licensed gun owners, who have proven themselves to be
>trustworthy, and it does absolutely nothing to deal the problem of hung
>gang members running around shooting each other to protect their drug
>business and the sense of street honour.

Yeah...all those drug dealers with assault weapons who drive around
with the black mamas in pink Cadillacs collecting welfare right? I
mean, I am sure that is what you really have in mind.
>