On Sat, 02 May 2020 20:50:28 -0300, Lucretia Borgia
> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 May 2020 07:55:15 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 02 May 2020 18:47:48 -0300, Lucretia Borgia
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 02 May 2020 14:30:01 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Lucretia Borgia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> They are not weapons you would use for hunting or defending your home,
>>>>> but rather military type weapons, made to kill many and quickly.
>>>>
>>>>That's what war is all about.
>>>
>>>I can agree but it is why I am glad they are going to be only for the
>>>military in this country. Civilians do not need them.
>>>>
>>>>> Weapons of war. I agree that I think men who want to own them are
>>>>> really covering up their own physical inadequacies, something like old
>>>>> bald men driving Maserati's.
>>>>
>>>>Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
>>>>
>>>>Q: I suppose with the feminist thing, did you also
>>>>support women's right to fight in combat? Should they
>>>>also be drafted if a draft ever happens again?
>>>>Not YOUR daughter though.
>>>
>>>So much burble - I did and do support a woman's right to fight in
>>>combat, yes, they should also be drafted but maybe not to actually
>>>fight, as with men, some are not combat minded.
>>
>>All men are?
>
>Can't you read? "as with men, some are not combat minded'

So if I had been Canadian or American and drafted and said "Sorry, I'm
not combat minded", I wouldn't have to fight?