Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 02 May 2020 20:50:28 -0300, Lucretia Borgia
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 03 May 2020 07:55:15 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 02 May 2020 18:47:48 -0300, Lucretia Borgia
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 02 May 2020 14:30:01 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lucretia Borgia wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are not weapons you would use for hunting or defending your home,
>>>>>> but rather military type weapons, made to kill many and quickly.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what war is all about.
>>>>
>>>> I can agree but it is why I am glad they are going to be only for the
>>>> military in this country. Civilians do not need them.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Weapons of war. I agree that I think men who want to own them are
>>>>>> really covering up their own physical inadequacies, something like old
>>>>>> bald men driving Maserati's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: I suppose with the feminist thing, did you also
>>>>> support women's right to fight in combat? Should they
>>>>> also be drafted if a draft ever happens again?
>>>>> Not YOUR daughter though.
>>>>
>>>> So much burble - I did and do support a woman's right to fight in
>>>> combat, yes, they should also be drafted but maybe not to actually
>>>> fight, as with men, some are not combat minded.
>>>
>>> All men are?
>>
>> Can't you read? "as with men, some are not combat minded'
>
> So if I had been Canadian or American and drafted and said "Sorry, I'm
> not combat minded", I wouldn't have to fight?
>

Exactly! They would have simply assigned you a butt licking
masseuse job in a R&R homo camp.