Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:02:24 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/fbbd5ZGx/Tiles-...-16-2020-2.jpg
>>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/dt8GV5RT/Tiles-...-16-2020-1.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Courtesy of Old World Roofing, doing in the Right Way! :-)
>>> I still can't believe how much this is costing you, it's not even a
>>> large house.
>> Me too, but I know quality work when I see it. No not large, only 1500 sqft and now it will have a renewed red clay tile roof, which is a 100 year roof. House was completed in 1930, so just shy of 100 years on the old one.
>>
>> John Kuthe...
> No, John. The original tiles you've allowed them to refit, are at the
> end of their 100 year life, that's why so many of them became
> weatherworn and absorbent, broke or leaked.
>
> For what they charged you the roof company should have fitted a
> whole roof of new tiles throughout. THEN you'd have a hundred-year tiled
> roof.
>
> What you've got now is a roof where the original old tiles will
> continue to deteriorate and fail, and need regular attention, repairs
> and replacements for the rest of your life.
>
> The roofing company must be laughing all the way to the bank.
>
> Janet UK

They started laughing when they saw his porch, I'm sure.