On Saturday, August 8, 2020 at 1:01:31 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, August 8, 2020 at 6:43:26 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 8, 2020 at 12:30:59 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> > > On Saturday, August 8, 2020 at 1:24:35 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> > > > Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mine's a ballistic nylon trifold. Probably intended for a man, but
> > > > > I don't care.
> > > >
> > > > I use a nylon trifold by QuickSilver that's very old and
> > > > showing it's age. I still love it.
> > > >
> > > > I have a newer one that just isn't as nice and I also was
> > > > gifted a leather wallet years ago from someone that felt
> > > > I needed a new wallet. heh I'll never use the leather one.
> > >
> > > "Surfer" wallets. Those are pretty popular on this rock and have been for decades. I dumped my old leather wallet and use a new fangled card carrying thingie in my front pocket. Keeping a fat-assed wallet in your ass pocket is just asking for trouble.
> > >
> > > https://www.amazon.com/Aluminum-Mini...dp/B079KN29PP/
> >
> > That is nice. I'm afraid it would block the chip in the card that
> > lets me in to my office building.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> Most people carry security cards on a lanyard around their neck or attached to their purse or some other place on their body. A security card that doesn't have to be pulled out would be a good thing.

I only use the card to get into the building and once in a blue moon
into a restricted lab. In my wallet is the best place. I don't have
to pull it out of the walled for it to be read.

> If you ask me, your security card should be your cell phone. For added security, your location would be tracked at all times when in the building or when you're out.

That would be an intolerable intrusion on my privacy.

My company is too cheap for a technology upgrade, anyway.

Cindy Hamilton