Can't reply. Header too long.
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:14:17 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>On 2020-10-30 1:00 p.m., U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
>> I don't see how the current U.S. population benefited from classes
>> that included sex. ed. , drugs, dating, etc., It seems to me that
>> young people were capable of finding out about stuff like that all by
>> themselves.
>
>Sex ed is probably a good idea for kids raised in families where stuff
>like that is never discussed. OTOH, it should only be taught by people
>who are capable of being honest about. My friend went to Catholic
>schools and was disgusted by the priest who taught sex ed and told his
>class that a girl can get pregnant by holding onto a boy's penis for 10
>seconds.
Are you saying that's not true?
===
That word was never used by our Nuns!
|