On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:21:22 -0800, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2021 Jan 25, , Boron Elgar wrote
>(in >):
>
>> Bovard is hardly a neutral source, which you should comprehend before
>> recommending him, and with a tiny bit of reading yourself, maybe 10
>> minutes' worth, you'd know that Marxism and Communism, as political
>> philosophies, are rather delightful, but when used as title only for
>> populist, despotic or dictatorial regimes with wholly differing
>> practices, millions get killed.
>
>The point, which you missed, was a hundred-million dead under various Marxist
>philosophies. I never heard of Bovard until I quick googled for dead people
>under Marxism and settled on the link. Do you deny the count? Should I
>re-google?
>The "delightful philosophy" of Marx assumes equality of birth, intelligence
>and ambition, much like worker bees or ants. None of that is true for a
>single human being ever born.Marxism, in any form, will never be done right.
>Individuals simply don´t work that way.

Apart from blaming Marx for all those dead people, I agree with you.
Where you go wrong is when you think that your Democratic party has
anything to do with Marxism, socialism or communism. That's you buying
into shock jock drivel and over the top right-wing spin. It's mass
hysteria.