On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:49:48 +0100, Pamela >
wrote:
>On 23:05 31 Mar 2021, Pamela said:
>
>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:55:47 +1100, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:44:43 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2021-03-31 5:19 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 3/31/2021 9:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> My son's wedding plans are on hold. He had planned to propose
>>>>>> on a trip to Peru last May but that fell through. They have
>>>>>> been waiting for restrictions to be lifted but I don't think
>>>>>> that is going to happen soon, and there is a bigger and bigger
>>>>>> backlog as this thing goes on. We are expecting another lock
>>>>>> down* to be announced within a few days because cases are
>>>>>> climbing again.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying he still hasn't *proposed*?* Nothing is stopping
>>>>> him from popping the question, no matter how long it takes for
>>>>> restrictions to ease for the actual wedding.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No. I said that he had planned to propose to her in Peru.
>>>>Specifically, he had hoped to so it at Machu Pichu. He had
>>>>bought a ring when they were in Columbia a few months earlier and
>>>>planned to give it to here there. That part of the plan fell
>>>>apart when the travel business shut down. They bought a house
>>>>together and moved in together last April.
>>>>
>>>>It's official. They are engaged.
>>>
>>>Does that still exist, engagement? Sounds so 1950. We just got
>>>married.
>>
>> Married? How last century. Unless you're a fag who likes to be
>> trendy.
>
>Mr Neodome, tsk tsk! That's very naughty because I strongly approve
>of marriage.
Yes. That's because you're just a woman, so you need financial
security.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imZ52DHBtug
--
The real Bruce posts with uni-berlin.de - individual.net