On Sat, 29 May 2021 11:41:27 -0600, wolfy's new skateboard
> wrote:

>On 5/29/2021 2:38 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 4:38:42 PM UTC-4, wolfy's new skateboard wrote:
>>> On 5/28/2021 1:43 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 5/28/2021 3:36 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 2:46:51 PM UTC-4, wolfy's new skateboard
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> ..nt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> United States
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Taro leaf-stems (petioles) for sale at a market in California, 2009
>>>>>> Taro has been grown for centuries in the United States, though it has
>>>>>> never attained the same popularity as in Asian and Pacific nations.
>>>>>> William Bartram observed South Carolina Sea Islands residents eating
>>>>>> roasted roots of the plant, which they called tanya, in 1791, and by the
>>>>>> 19th century it was common as a food crop from Charleston to
>>>>>> Louisiana.[82] In the 1920s, dasheen[nb 1], as it was known, was highly
>>>>>> touted by the Secretary of the Florida Department of Agriculture as a
>>>>>> valuable crop for growth in muck fields.[84] Fellsmere, Florida, near
>>>>>> the east coast, was a farming area deemed perfect for growing dasheen.
>>>>>> It was used in place of potatoes and dried to make flour. Dasheen flour
>>>>>> was said to make excellent pancakes when mixed with wheat flour. Since
>>>>>> the late 20th century, taro chips have been available in many
>>>>>> supermarkets and natural food stores, and taro is often used in American
>>>>>> Chinatowns, in Chinese cuisine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet it never seemed to catch on the way corn, wheat, potatoes, and
>>>>> rice have.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the Darwinian pressures of starch selection, it was far from "the
>>>>> fittest".
>>>>>
>>>>> If you eat meat and vegetables, you don't need taro as a "superfood". It
>>>>> doesn't even have that much fiber. Poi has a paltry 1 gram per cup.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>
>>>> It's mostly carbs.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>> PHENOLS!
>>
>> VEGETABLES!
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>
>Some have high phenols, others not so much.
>
>So?
Ask them, theyre here. "You can stop saying that now. Thank you."
--
The other Dave Smith