Grand Daughters
On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 10:19:21 AM UTC-5, bruce bowser wrote:
> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 10:00:29 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> > On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 8:07:48 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 6:57:34 AM UTC-5, Snag wrote:
> > >
> > > > We've got 2 of 'em (14 & 18) up for a couple of weeks for a visit ,
> > > > and they can cook ! Last night they fixed a honey-ginger chicken dish
> > > > that was pretty tasty served over rice . I made them give me the recipe
> > > > ... their repertoire is limited , but they're young and have plenty of
> > > > time to add new dishes as they discover what they like .
> > > > --
> > > > Snag
> > > > Race only matters to racists ...
> > > >
> > > You ****ing turd. 245 years of slavery, and more than a century of Jim
> > > Crow and its continuing half century legacy doesn't go away because
> > > you puke out some right-wing talking points phrase. Imagine your 14 YO
> > > grand daughter being raped by a man who is legally allowed to *own*
> > > her. That's the history you want conveniently brushed aside. Again,
> > > imagine your 14 YO grand daughter being raped by a man who is legally
> > > allowed to *own* her. "Shut your mouth you little bitch. I can **** you
> > > any time I want. You belong to me." Imagine the 18 year old feeling a
> > > little guilty that she's glad that Master has taken up ****ing her little
> > > sister because it takes some of the pressure off of her. I dare you, turd.
> > > >
> > > --Bryan
> > >
> > 100 proof breakfast???
>
I don't drink anything stronger than wine, with the rare exception of sipping
liqueurs or brandies, and I had my last beer before 7 pm yesterday. Terry is
an ally of White supremacists, and needed to be called out. He really should
try to imagine his own grand daughters being treated the way that was legal
for much of the history of Black persons in America, but he'll never believe
that Black girls deserve the same respect as White girls. I *know* that *I'm*
a beneficiary of White privilege. So does he. The difference is, he's a lying
sack of shit.
>
> 200 proof isn't bad, either.
>
200 proof is impractical. As the concentration on alcohol increases, it takes
more effort to remove those last few bits of water.
>
--Bryan
|