"The Ranger" > wrote in message
news
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:35:38 GMT, sf > wrote:

<snipped>

You must be astoundingly dense. You repeatedly present all this information
about choices, ambition, choices, etc., and what you completely fail to see
is that IT IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION (yes I was
yelling, although I doubt it will do any good). Yes, workers have choices,
yes many of them better themselves thru hard work and gumption, yes many of
those who stay in low-end jobs do so because of apathy of fear.

IRRELEVANT!!!

The original discussion was on the question of whether people who work at
low-end jobs should be paid a decent wage. The question of why they are in
this job and whether they have opportunities to "move up" if they so choose
does not come into it. It's a simple matter of fair compensation for work
performed.

You are big on choices. One might then say that you "choose" not to
understand this extremely simple concept. Or is it that you lack the mental
capacity to understand it? Either way, you just don't get it and, I suspect,
never will (although you may think you do).


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.