"PENMART01" > wrote in message
...
> >"Kswck" writes:
>>
>>> All goes to prove what I've said inumerable times, if ya don't have the
>>> innate
>>> talent then all the best cooking schools in the world can't help, yer
>>> totally
>>> hopeless and will NEVER be a good cook... cooking is an art form...
>>> just
>>> like
>>> a painter, sculptor, musician, even an athlete, ya gotta be born with
>>> the
>>> talent. You can learn *about* cooking but you cannot learn to
>>> *actually*
>>> cook, those culinary schools, ALL of them, are a total rip off, they
>>> prey
>>> on
>>> vanity same as a vanity press.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry you had a less than satisfactory experience but it's better
>>> you
>>> experienced it for yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
>>> ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
>>> *********
>>> "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
>>> Sheldon
>>> ````````````
>>
>>That of course presupposes that those who go to culinary school want to be
>>an employed professional chef.
>>
>>Personally, I would like to go to culinary school just for the knowledge
>>base-not to work lousy hours, weekends and nights for who knows how long.
>>I couldn't support myself while in school that long-that's why I've never
>>done it.
>
> Only someone with more dollars than brain cells would pay the astronomical
> tuition simply to experience pot stirring while decked out in a crisp set
> of
> whites... because if you have the natural talent and cook regularly then
> there
> is no knowlege base there for you to acquire, none whatsoever.
>
>
> ---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
> ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
> *********
> "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
> Sheldon
> ````````````

Having the natural tralent is one thing-being able to channel it is
something else.