"Kswck" > wrote in message
et...
>
> "PENMART01" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> (Leila A.)
> >>
> >>"Vox Humana" wrote:
> >>> "Frank J Warner" wrote:
> > Vox Humana wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>> In the event that you will consider another brand and can find a good
> >>> charity for the excess money you will save, you might consider this
> >>> cookware. I have been very pleased and I am probably as old and
clumsy
> >>> as
> >>> you and have had no problems with breakage: http://tinyurl.com/4shn2
> >>
> >>I am really impressed with the look of the
> >>Wolfgang Puck collections, especially at the price.
> >
> > Why do so many consider the appearance of cookware its most important
> > aspect???
> >
>
> I think I'd automatically wonder about anyone who goes out of their way to
> display their cookware. Are they more for show than anything else?
> Displaying fancy cookware doesn't mean one can cook. My cookware is
visible
> rather than displayed-only because I don't have the cabinet space to hide
it
> all. And it is of no particular brand of note-indeed it is not a full set
of
> any one manufacturer and/or name (i.e. Puck, Emeril, etc.). I use what I
> like, rather than what some infomercial says I should have.
>

I guess I'm lucky in that I happen to like the less expensive cookware and
there was no infomercial involved.