"Leila A." > wrote in message
om...
> Frank J Warner > wrote in message
>...
> > In article >, PENMART01
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > >Frank J Warner attempts to hustle us with:
> > > >
> > > >What I hope to achieve with this purchase is to display.
> > >
> > > Why your need to display your cookware
> >
> > Conspicuous ****ing consumption, of course.
> >
> > And, as you haven't been invited, it shouldn't be your problem.
> >
>
> HAH! You go, Frank. Sounds like you've earned the right to spend your
> money as you please.
>
> Why do people bitch about the purchase of a $600 set of pots that will
> last 20 years, but never peep about a $3,000 computer that's obsolete
> before the next Presidential election?
>
> I had a friend in Berkeley years ago who sneered at my purchase of
> fine china upon my marriage (relatives gave us money specifically
> marked for it). If I'd spent the same money on a mountain bike or a
> computer, she would have approved. THe china could very well outlast
> me. I've been married 6.5 years, and the hypothetical computer and/or
> mountain bike would be nearly shot by now.

You have mixed two issues here. First, it is really up to the person with
the money how he spends it. That is a matter of values. The second issue
is of durability. I disagree with your analogy using electronic or
mechanical equipment. Both do wear out. The computer not only is subject
to wear and tear, but will become obsolete even if remains in perfect
working condition. Decent cookware does not wear out or become obsolete. A
decent pan that is 100 years old will perform as well as a new one. The
question is what is decent. There comes a point in cookware where there are
diminishing returns on your investment in relation to function. Once you
cross a certain threshold, you are paying for something intangible. The
same is true with your china. A person can buy very serviceable tableware
for a few dollars. Even the most expensive tableware can end up being
"obsolete" from a fashion point of view. The cool china pattern that you
picked out when you were married at 19 may not be reflective of your taste
or social position when you are 50. While still quite functional, it may be
for all practical purposes "obsolete." I always wonder if this will be the
case with expensive, elaborate tattoos that I see on young people. I
chuckle when I think about the possibility of an elaborately tattooed person
eventually diapered, sitting in front of the TV in an assisted living
facility in the middle of the century.