Michel Boucher wrote:
> Richard Periut > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>>Oh yeah Fallujah, the place they attacked last April. Maybe you
>>>will have better luck next time.
>>>
>>
>>They didn't attack it with full force. Now that the fag foaming in
>>the mouth liberal commies have no voice, things will be done the
>>good ole'e USA way.
>
>
> And you'll only succeed in making martyrs of the people there and the
> fighting will start somewhere else, fuelled by the need to avenge
> their death (a concept you should be familiar with, by now).
>
>
>>Way too much freedom for a dangerous species like ours, has to be
>>met with only one thing our species understands best; brutal
>>force.
>
>
> Spoken like a true Nazi.
>
No, spoken like a true realist. You and many others don't get it do you?
Can't you see that we are entering a dangerous era, in which nuclear
weapons in the wrong hands is going to cause massive genocide? It wont
be long before India and Pakistan will go at it. The concentrated hatred
between them is going to fuel it.

Our species dropped from the trees so recently, that we think more with
our primitive brain (emotions,) than with our cortex (intellect.) So a
massive nuclear exchange is bound to take place, if these powers are
left in place.

Al Quaeda had its main operation in Afghanistan. We went in, and at
least crippled their agenda. Saddam was a trouble maker, and we are
better off without him (and so is the rest of the world.)

And if these governments are going to control and manipulate us with
their oil; then it's a good thing we have control over one of the worlds
largest reserves. Besides, the French and other countries were going to
benefit (as they were, and more will be made evident,) from being
"friends" with Saddam.

Better us than them!

Rich

--
"Dum Spiro, Spero."

As long as I breath, I hope.

Cicero (Ancient Rome)





ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤° `°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> ·´¯`·. , .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

Let there be fish!!!