View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)   Report Post  
Pan Ohco
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 18 Nov 2004 10:51:07 -0800, (Cindy
hamilton) wrote:


>Sorry for oversharing. However, the previous poster was trying to
>draw some connection between ability to procreate and fitness for
>marriage. I was wondering how his theory might relate to the
>childless heterosexual couple.
>
>Honestly, there's a lot more to marriage than sexual intercourse.
>(Not that I believe you are ill-informed in this regard--I'm just
>spouting.) I wonder why so many people are fixated on that.
>
>Cindy Hamilton


O.K. just my two cents.

Marriage is a contract for the benefit of any children born of that
union, and originally was a religious ceremony.

That being said,why the government is involved in anyway at all with
marriage is beyond me.

Pan Ohco