Naomi Darvell wrote:
> x-no-archive: tes
>
> Louis Cohen wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>The Joy of Cooking is encyclopedic, but very bland.
>>
>
>
> The original Joy of Cooking was weird. It could make for fun reading,
> especially the comments before the recipes. For a diet salad dressing: "No, it
> isn't particularly good, but it can be eaten by the bulging with a clear
> conscience." (Quote may not be exact, but I lost my copy.) Some of the recipes
> were good and others were crap.
>
>
>
>
> Naomi D.
>
JOC serves more as a blueprint for recipes (as most recipes.) I find it
the most complete and eclectic cook book of the times.

There is no other collection that can boast such properties for the
price. A true bible of cooking.

Rich

--
"Dum Spiro, Spero."

As long as I breath, I hope.

Cicero (Ancient Rome)





ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸¸¸,ø¤° `°¤ø,¸¸,ø¤°`°¤ø
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> ·´¯`·. , .·´¯`·.. ><((((º>

Let there be fish!!!