zxcvbob wrote:

> Let's say (ridiculously) that he's right and they did shoot first. With
> the one gun in the party. That makes one justifiable homicide and 5
> first degree murders (plus tresspassing, and probably a bunch of other
> lesser violations.) It's especially difficult to justify shooting the
> unarmed folks that came later to try to rescue the first victims.
>
> I still wish he'd pointed that empty rifle at one of the game wardens or
> sheriff's deputies when they caught him. It could have saved the
> taxpayers a lot of money.

Nothing about the whole story makes any sense whatsoever unless it's
accepted that the guy must be FLAT OUT crazy.

nancy