|
|
|
|
zxcvbob wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> Internet Traveler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Xenophobia might not be such a bad thing...
>>> The dumbest part of the reporters story was "We do not know who shot
>>> first"...
>>> Take a wild guess...
>>
>>
>>
>> A guess is as good as you can do. Would it be the guy in the blind or
>> the guys who though it was their blind and had the right to shoot a
>> trespasser?
>>
>
> From what I can tell from numerous news accounts, a tresspasser opened
> fire without warning on a hunting party when they told him he had to
> leave. When their buddies came to investigate, he shot them too.
>
> It's pretty obvious that the hunters didn't return fire because they
> would have had longer-ranged and more accurate rifles. If the hunters
> had started it, or if they had returned fire, the tresspasser would be
> dead and at most 1 or 2 of the hunters would have been shot.
>
> Bob
http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5098233.html
Bob
|